BeatlesVideos
Latest videos by upsidedowns1
 |
Pro-Israel lobby has warped U.S. policy Pt.1 Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 2958 seconds John Mearsheimer, a University of Chicago political science professor, and Stephen Walt, a professor of international relations at Harvard University's Kennedy School, said the U.S. government's unstinting support for Israel's recent war in Lebanon once again placed the agenda of what they call the Israel lobby ahead of U.S. strategic interests. Related: harvard, iraq, israel, john, lebanon, lobby, mearsheimer, walt, war Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Yale Shmale Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 154 seconds Canada's Lakehead university unveils edgy PR campaign Takes aim at Bush's Ivy League roots Related: bush, canada, conservatives, harper, mock, ridicule, shmale, toronto, university, war, yale Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Putin System Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 793 seconds Putin ingratiates himself with Yeltsin and his future is guaranteed. Related: government, putin, regional, russia, state Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Jason Kenney Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 189 seconds Jason Kenney likens Hezbollah to German Nazi party of the 1930s Related: canada, harper, lebanon, liberals, steven Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![Putin\](http://img.youtube.com/vi/tB92dPhbaAk/2.jpg "Putin\") |
Putin's Gazprom Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 353 seconds Putin's control of oil over Europe Related: government, putin, regional, russia, state Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Re: Does Stephen Harper have a hidden agenda? Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 83 seconds Harper pandering To His base Of Social Conservatives Related: canada, dion, harper, politics Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![Harper\](http://img.youtube.com/vi/9HDwrPxAbf8/2.jpg "Harper\") |
Harper's Rules Posted by: upsidedowns1
Video duration: 288 seconds Shell Games Related: canada, cheat, conservative, harper, lie Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Beatles videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: ashehryar1. on 23 Nov 08, 08:31:27
Talk about personal attacks, apparently you are throwing one at me by stating that I am visiting thesaurus. Nothing wrong if my vocabulary skills happen to be superior than yours. UN charter calls for engagement of security council, Geneva convention bars all attacks on civilians, and international law prohibits savage killings of children. Your military is in toilet in all of them. Seems like you're the straw man for stating they existed without even knowing what was there. Hypocrisy.
By: bigjelmapro. on 23 Nov 08, 08:12:18
See you've visited the thesaurus as I see nothing other than personal attacks rather than a legitimate argument. You've failed in using the UN charter, Geneva conventions, or any international law that rules out the use of force as a reaction to Hezbollah's acts of war Now we have another straw man stating that since I wasn't in every site which were hit by missiles, missile storage, and bunker complex, then they don't exist. Hezbollah utilized civilians as a political tool to their advantage.
By: ashehryar1. on 23 Nov 08, 08:07:01
sure and you were the one to discover the missiles personally. Your anemic arguments are unable to justify the sadism of your military in civilian areas of Beirut and other parts of Lebanon. Most areas bombed were civilian infrastructure, let alone militant hideouts. An attempt was made to experiment with precision guided weapons against the innocent. The disease hasn't spread to Americans. The disease causes hemmorhage in people like you who rely on forgery and myth to justify your solecism.
By: bigjelmapro. on 23 Nov 08, 05:35:21
ashehryar1, you've used this angle previously to no great effect. S. Beirut was the Hezbollah HQ where the brunt of long, medium and short range missiles were stored in bunkers. This isn't news and Hezbollah were quite proud of this. When the IDF pressed into S. Lebanon, Hezbollah fired missiles into S. Lebanon from Beirut as well, which is within range of IDF troops in the South So you going to bring up any parts in the Geneva convetions, laws of engagement or UN Charter or mudsling some more?
By: bigjelmapro. on 23 Nov 08, 05:31:10
FedFarmer, you really have issues with Jews overall since you enjoy scapegoating them for the maladies you face. Previously, I thought this was the restricted to the Pan-Arabism/Islamism periods, but its a disease has spread to many Americans. AIPAC influence is exaggerated. NRA, Tyco, Aramco, etc. influence is greater. Bicker about Israel. Another scapegoat for greater issues facing your government today. Quite hypocritical on your part as well.
By: FedFarmer. on 23 Nov 08, 04:03:24
"Bullshit. You hate Jews." All one need do is express disagreement with US policy on supporting Israel, and the zionists all come out of their holes and scream anti-semitism and 'you hate Jews'. Folks, this is what AIPAC is doing to our Congress EVERY DAY. If you are a rep and you don't suck up to AIPAC and support Israel no matter WHAT crimes they commit, even when we suffer like we did on 911, they will smear you and fund your opponent in the next election and you will LOSE. AIPAC MUST DIE
By: ashehryar1. on 23 Nov 08, 02:20:41
haha! Quiet some range of Katyushas. Beirut was bombed because it was used to fire rockets into Israeil. Utter nonsense and lack of geographical knowledge I must say. If death ratio is not an argument, then no need to grouse about missiles killing your citizens. Just shows lack of interest on your part about preserving lives. First it was UN charter, then geneva conventions and now lack of interest in preserving lives. Anything else from your fatuous mind that will hide your mendacity?
By: bigjelmapro. on 22 Nov 08, 08:32:53
Protection of civilians is a responsibility of the country from where they exist. Creation of bomb shelters to accommodate the Lebanese civilians was not done, Israel it was. Hezbollah fired from protected civilian areas, including schools, mosques and hospitals, which turns these areas into legitimate targets in the Geneva conventions. Death ratios is not an argument, just shows Hezbollah's lack of interest in preserving life. So no rebuttal then. Just more baseless rhetoric. Rebut already.
By: ashehryar1. on 22 Nov 08, 05:23:13
Look who's talking about deflections. Geneva convention also calls out protection of civilians. So while the Israeili military followed all rules that suited bloodthirstiness and barbarism, it forgot about all other rules. 1100 Lebanese including 30% children were killed as compared to 40 or so israeilis. Blatant proof of your deflections. Lebanon had all the right to retaliate in response to uncouth act from Israel. Perfidy? So now a question of faithfulness? Who's being righteous now?
By: bigjelmapro. on 21 Nov 08, 09:10:24
UN Charter chapter VII is in regards to the UN's own response to a specified conflict and has nothing to do with regards to the country's response to attack Laws of engagement/war and Geneva conventions allow the attack of residential areas directly if they are being used by the enemy as stages of attack and storage of arms. Military objectives in response to an unprovoked attack is not against any international law Hezbollah committed extensive acts of perfidy. So no need for more deflections
By: ashehryar1. on 21 Nov 08, 02:45:41
Only in Jewish and neo-conservative christian communities is Israel's brutality against Lebanon regarded as self defense. Israeli army committed war crimes and violated international humanitarian law by killings of thousands of innocent Lebanese. Almost 30% of killed were young children. Charter VII requires approval and engagement of security council. Please enlighten yourself before being fallacious. But then again, since your ethics are significantly different, ignorance is also a bliss.
By: bigjelmapro. on 20 Nov 08, 06:51:03
Only in the Arab and Islamic uhmmah is Hezbollah regarded as a resistance movement. The UN is complacent and UNIFIL incompetent in allowing an illegal militia to continue to exist against previous UN resolutions. Hezbollah instigated the war and under rules of engagement, geneva conventions, and UN charter chapter VII, Israel is allowed to act as a means of self-defense. IDF/IAF abided by rules of engagement, Hezbollah never did. Rebuttal or more name calling? Pretty weak on your part.
By: ashehryar1. on 20 Nov 08, 05:29:29
Finally, 'bigjelmapro' acknowledged a UN report of 1191 civilian casualties, only to fabricate it before finishing the sentence. Typical 'bigjelmapro'. Sure I agree Israel dropped leaflets, only for them to fall in your backyard. No wonder 1191 innocent civilians were savagely killed. Lebanon had all the right to resist once Israeli army violated basic UN charter of invasion. Thanks for your risible and puerile answers to my arguments. Even a 2 year old can poop on them.
By: bigjelmapro. on 19 Nov 08, 19:16:51
Beware of the misguided bigots.
By: HeWhoKnowsTruth. on 19 Nov 08, 17:56:10
Beware of the backstabbing Jews!
By: bigjelmapro. on 19 Nov 08, 12:16:29
Israel warned of positions which were going to be struck via leaflets, Hezbollah didn't (since it uses terror weapons unguided missiles with no target besides inflicting civilian casualties). Hezbollah's intention of this was widely disseminated According to UN records, 1,191 civilians were killed in Lebanon, a number of which were Hezbollah fighters. Problem with guerrilla fighters is the moment they hit the ground, they are deemed civilians Thanks for the easily disputed straw man arguments.
By: bigjelmapro. on 19 Nov 08, 12:11:20
The term terrorism doesn't change. Its the intentional targeting of civilians (soft targets) with the intent of inflicting maximum casualties for political/ideological purposes and creating a sense of terror that anybody could be next. Israel didn't have military installations within highly populated areas, Hezbollah did. Israel doesn't hide behind civilians and fire rockets within residential areas, Hezbollah did. Israel abided by rules of engagement/war, Hezbollah didn't.
By: ashehryar1. on 19 Nov 08, 03:19:03
Israel's terrorist activities in Lebanon war that killed thousands of innocents is being justified by ignorant translation of terrorism and spurious statements on UN reports. Fallacious arguments are being taken out of the toilet. The french version was created in the 1700s. This is 2008. Knock knock. btw French isn't the only language alive in the world. You're not writing in french here. Perhaps, it is time you augment your english skills. Nice oblivious translation. Try something better.
By: bigjelmapro. on 18 Nov 08, 07:06:50
Double standard: Israel is struck by unguided munitions to terrorize all of her citizens, and its referred to as 'moaning' when brought up. Lebanon's Hezbollah infrastructure is struck in Lebanon as a reaction to Hezbollah unprovoked invasion of Israel, instigating the act of war, and its an injustice. Terrorism is a French word. Your perversion of the term doesn't change it. Israel receives Al-Manar feed, over 40% of Israelis speak Arabic. Nice try. Next!
By: ashehryar1. on 18 Nov 08, 05:23:13
bigjelmapro started by crying out loud about the katyushas mess that was to be cleaned and went on to groan and fabricate the UN report by advertising his version. The meaning of terror in every language is simple: Frightful and awful violence or bloodshed. Israeili army in war with Lebanon fit well in the definition. Again, another opinion about Nasrallah. Perhaps you get predisposed version of every news over there. Your mumbo-jumbo about warfare is based on utter nonsense and scum.
By: bigjelmapro. on 17 Nov 08, 06:45:28
(cont) Nasrallah himself has stated that if he knew the reaction of Israel would be so swift to this act of war, it never would've started this war. A 'balanced equation' in a time of asymmetric warfare, where 1 side, Hezbollah, hides behind Lebanese civilians to inflict more damage, building their command structure and staging attacks from these areas (Geneva conventions allow these areas to be attacked as military targets), compared to Israel who is protecting them, is utter nonsense.
By: bigjelmapro. on 17 Nov 08, 06:39:02
(cont) of Hezbollah as a 'reaction' to an attack on their airport and escape routes of the killers and kidnappers of IDF soldiers IN Israel in an attempt to frame that it wasn't Hezbollah who committed the 1st act of war but actually Israel. Hezbollah, who is representative of the Lebanese government as it holds a number of seats, is the one that committed the 1st act of war by attacking a country without provocation and deceived the Lebanese government without notification.
By: bigjelmapro. on 17 Nov 08, 06:33:34
Ashehryar1 started by stating that the over 4000 katyushas/missiles that hit Israel is merely an opinion, disregarding the extensive evidence of this undisputed fact. Then he went off to state that there is no difference between a directed strike against a military target and that of random strikes against a civilian population WITH the intent to cause massive civilian casualties and terror. The latter being the very definition of Terrorism itself. Then there is an attempt to justify the terror
By: ashehryar1. on 16 Nov 08, 21:20:54
Perhaps in the world of "bigjelmapro" there were no civilian areas hit in Lebanon. The reality is that there were. Hitting the airport of a sovereign nation is an act of war. You give injustice and bombs you get missiles. Balanced equation. Not delusional but dramatic and more like waggish coming out from you.
By: bigjelmapro. on 16 Nov 08, 20:53:08
You're trying to be the righteous one? The one who doesn't distinguish between guided and unguided munitions and the difference between hitting random targets and that of military targets. That's the difference in definition of terror and targets of military importance. There was no 'pounding'. In the beginning the Beirut airport's runways were hit to prevent shipping out the soldiers that were kidnapped without provocation on Israeli soil, an act of war. Squawk, hehe. Delusional...